Cowboys to Obtain Aaron Glenn

Posted: April 26, 2005 @ 12:35 am

The draft is over, but the Cowboys’ front office continues to grind. The Houston Chronicle is reporting this evening that Dallas has reached a contract agreement with Houston Texans cornerback Aaron Glenn. The Texans will grant Glenn his release in the next few days, at which point he will join the Cowboys.

Glenn will most likely fill the nickel back spot and give Dallas depth behind starters Anthony Henry and Terrence Mathis. The Cowboys took three cornerbacks in the late rounds of the ‘04 draft but Bruce Thornton is coming off an ACL reconstruction and Jacques Reeves and Nate Jones both struggled adapting to the NFL game.

The acquistion of Glenn probably spells the end of Pete Hunter’s time as a Cowboy. The three year veteran was upset by the Henry signing and refused a team request to move to free safety.

Update: The Cowboys had competition for Glenn from three other teams, including the New England Patriots.

Comments

147 Responses to “Cowboys to Obtain Aaron Glenn”

  1. 1
    David on April 26th, 2005 12:44 am

    or…
    Hunter decides that now there is no chance for him to start at CB, even in the slot, so he agrees to go to camp as a FS to compete for the starting spot there. Remember, even if he does go with the idea, there is no guarantee that he will start. If that is the case though, then he probably will be done. I think BP will consider the team in rebuilding mode for at least another season or two (which means I also think he’ll get a new contract from JJ (Jerry), and stick around in Dallas for a while), so he will probably try to keep some younger guys who buy into his system over veterans (hate using that word for Hunter, doesn’t deserve it) like Pete. But we will see.

  2. 2
    David on April 26th, 2005 12:47 am

    By the way, I think nabbing Glenn, even if he only here for depth, is a good idea. Another player who will gladly finish his solid career with his favorite coach BP (see Fergusen, Glenn (Terry), KJ, etc…). These guys are good to have on the team even if they don’t play, because they can help the younger players to understand what BP preaches and exactly what they need to do. In other words, good signing.

  3. 3
    darrell w on April 26th, 2005 12:54 am

    I totally disagree with this move. We need youth. I know at one time Glenn was an excellent CB, however, that was one time. Too old and small. This is the one area where I have disagreement with BP, let your old war buddies go off into the sunset. So no to Glenn.

  4. 4
    atx_1973 on April 26th, 2005 12:56 am

    I agree with David, I think is a great pick-up the guy is savy vet that can contribute on the field and in the locker room.

    Man, I am glad I decided to keep my season tickets. It was more of a financial decision than not being a die-hard fan. So far on paper we should drastic improvement on “D” from a year. Keep it up Tuna & JJ!!

  5. 5
    atx_1973 on April 26th, 2005 1:01 am

    Come on Darrell. We have almost no one behind Henry & Newman as back-ups. How can u not like this move? Last time I looked young even avg. CB’s weren’t gonna play for peanuts. Hell Henry got a $10 mill. bonus and he isn’t even an all-pro. I give this two thumbs up. I don’t see how others keep saying we could land Ty Law, I am sure he wouldn’t sign for peanuts. I would have loved to have Law but I don’t think he is finacially feasible.

  6. 6
    J on April 26th, 2005 1:08 am

    were we that upset with what frazier showed us that he doesn’t get the chance to grow into the nickel back we need?

    i’m not saying he didn’t make mistakes, but i thought he showed enough to at least be considered for the role.

    and the coaches seem big on jones and reeves,
    does someone else in addition to hunter get the boot to make room for glenn?

  7. 7
    Paul Young on April 26th, 2005 1:51 am

    J

    And what if Frazier fails after getting that chance? We live with that for the rest of the season? Under Parcells this is the kind of chance you get. He always says that he is going to keep bringing them in and if you want to play than you rise to the top. This is a good pick up. It adds another veteran and more depth.

    Darell
    We picked up our youth on the weekend.

  8. 8
    David on April 26th, 2005 2:13 am

    Don’t think this means Frazier is done, think about this–Glenn hasn’t played the in the slot, so he may just back up Newman and Henry. Frazier may get the “starting” nod at slot CB–of course, Bruce Thornton, Jacques Reeves, and even Pete Hunter (though I doubt it) could also end up playing there. It all depends on who plays the best, and who can show BP what he wants to see. Friday, when we know which UFA’s we nabbed for the rookie mini-camp, and June 1st (we might cut people as well) are going to be pretty good indicators of what were goin to do–keep them circled on the calendars.

    —Just an idea, but I know Detroit just released WR Az-Zahir Akeem since he will take catches away from the youngen’s. He might be able to provide some depth at WR if BP were so inclined. Just thought I’d throw that in to comfort y’all who still think WR is our top need

  9. 9
    Archie on April 26th, 2005 3:04 am

    that is a great Idea but I was thinking Marion back in Silver and Blue wouldn’t be a bad idea also. Anybody

  10. 10
    SilverStar on April 26th, 2005 3:19 am

    (1) I do like Parcell’s self-proclaimed approach: you come to camp, you compete for a spot and if you’re the best, you’re on the field, no matter who you are.

    However, I’ve a hard time trusting Bill to be a fair judge of talent when one of his old boys are involved. That’s what worries me about Aaron Glenn. Bill seems to be able to recall the “type” of player someone was for him extremely well. He puts a lot of trust into these memories and he fears the unknown that you get with young, unproven players.

    This is most true with the non-battle for #1 QB last season.

    Will history repeat itself with Glenn in the secondary ahead of Frazier or Bruce Thornton? If so, this could hurt the development of our young guys. That would be a disappointment.

  11. 11
    Carioca on April 26th, 2005 3:28 am

    Pete Hunter?

    I would have bet against the boys trading or cutting Hunter. However, now that I’ve heard Jerry say “probably not” about Hunter at Safety, I’m not so sure. Its what Jerry didn’t say — he didn’t say “Hunters going to compete at corner” or that “he’s to valuable for us on the slot”. Basically, what I heard from Jerry when he said “probably not” was I don’t care about that guy.

    I think that’s too bad. Hunter has the physical gifts to be effective, if not as a starter at least as a bad-up. Hell, we thought he would be a starter last season.

    However, if we try to deal him, we’ll really get almost nothing back. He’s an unproven player who’s coming off a major injury. He didn’t prove anything during his career and still can only point to potential. No one will give up much for that. Maybe a 6th or 7th pick (conditional) next season. Maybe nothing. Maybe he’s just cut. Remember our young star - Derrick Ross ? What happend to him when he acted-up and fell out of favor? Goodbye. Antonio Bryant? Goodbye.

  12. 12
    LaMonte on April 26th, 2005 4:13 am

    I was thinking hey maybe play him at safety because of his ability to cover but he’s not that tall. I’m not sure what the average height is for free safety. Competition is gonna be tough this year if you wanna play your going to have to show it early and often. I can see how BP’s older players help younger players understand the coach as well mentor the position but I hope either thornton, frazier or reeves beat him out. I prefer young highly motivated corners. Glenn is a good insurance policy so I’m not mad that they got him but I want the young guys to come up.

  13. 13
    Carl S. on April 26th, 2005 4:30 am

    Aaron Glenn is a great pick-up. There is virtually zero depth behind Newman and Henry. Frazier looks okay in the nickel, but after that we are in big trouble. Whatever Aaron Glenn has lost physically, he can compensate for with experience and savvy. You know he is not going to blow any assignments or jump too many double moves. He will be in the right place at the right time. You have to take into consideration what his role will be. He is not the savior of the secondary. It’s not like anyone is saying “Okay Aaron, you got T.O. today, good luck dog.” He’s a backup. Yeah he’s an aging veteran, but he is far better than our other reserves.

  14. 14
    Don S. on April 26th, 2005 6:42 am

    I like the Glenn pick up. As was proved last year (and not just by Dallas) you can never have too many CB’s.

    Keep bringing in the talent and let the best one play.

  15. 15
    Terrance on April 26th, 2005 7:16 am

    So what do you guys think about a Brock Marion return to Dallas

  16. 16
    LaMonte on April 26th, 2005 7:42 am

    By what I read on the team website it seems that BP is going to give Beriault a chance so we might not see the return of Brock.

  17. 17
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 8:10 am

    Darrell (and anyone who thinks this is unfair to the younger players on this team),

    As far as I am concerned, there are 4 starting jobs up for grabs in the Dallas secondary, and nickle corner too. If Pete Hunter or Frazier feel cheated … step it up then guys!! Parcells will play the best player he has. If he didn’t it would be unfair to the rest of the TEAM.

  18. 18
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 8:17 am

    If it is true that Hunter wants out of Big D, then let him finish training camp with the Boys. If he does well and learns to except his roll, we keep him. If he plays well, and is still discontent with having a star on his helmet, at least he will have value. So trade him. If he does poorly, then give him the boot.

  19. 19
    jessej652001 on April 26th, 2005 9:13 am

    i say if hunter wont go to saftey then what about trying to bring ty law in at saftey. he could be back with parcells the man who drafted him and he would be a great cover saftey so roy can go be roy and law could finish his career as a cowboy, that would be awsome imagine all the puns we could use with LAW in dallas. so if hunter is out then bring in law for saftey he is someone who would be a great mentor for our young DB core. what does anyone think about this?

  20. 20
    Gene on April 26th, 2005 9:42 am

    I think the Aaron Glenn pick up is a solid move. We have no depth at CB and he could certainly help the team in some way. It’s not like they are going to sign him to a multi year deal…probably a one year low dollar contract.

    Brock Marion used to be the man at free safety, but I’ve heard that his day is done. I’d be neutral on this move since we really don’t have a proven player in that spot as of yet. Hey if he is better than anything else we have then why not sign him to a one year deal to help out back then and maybe mentor some of the youngins’.

    Pete Hunter needs to quit his whinning and step up. If he thinks he’s better than Anthony Henry or good enough to start at the slot position then PROVE IT. He should have kept his mouth shut and graciously taken on the opportunity to compete for the FS position. Based on Jerry’s reaction to the question regarding Hunter, I’d say he’s probably a goner. Personally, I think they should take him to camp and see what he can do. We’ve had that guy on the team for the past 3 years and it would be a shame to get nothing for our time and investment.

  21. 21
    michael on April 26th, 2005 10:12 am

    i think glenn would be a good vet to have.frazier showed flashes and newman`s sopfmore slump was untimely and henry is good but also learning.glenn can help frazier with his problems and help newmans confidence about coming off a below avg yr and all the youg ones on what it tkes to take the next step to getting better.bring brock in for at least a yr.s from ball st will need to learn from a true fs and brock was above avg so that could help.drop trade jacobs for someone else t usc hasn`t proven 2nd round value,not versetile to change sides.look at l.allen and t.walters and yes d.kenard,even erick williams in the beginning played guard.i just don`t think he is giong to make it.won`t beat out adams.

  22. 22
    Rick Gray on April 26th, 2005 11:00 am

    Ok we all know Brock Marion is getting up there in age but I would think signing him to a one or two year contract would be a wise move. We know he can play free saftey and that is more than what we have now. If we do find a younger guy that has potential for the position at least they have a veteran to help mold them a bit and a good insurance policy in case of injury. The only thing I worry about is we have so much on defense right now I dont know how we are going to be able to keep all this younger talent. There just isnt enough room on the roster for all of them. So who goes? Ty Law would be great but I just dont see that happening with the money he wants. Also can any one tell me when and what site we start hearing about the free agent signings? Can say enough about how our BOYS drafted this year. Awesome!!!!

  23. 23
    Rick Gray on April 26th, 2005 11:04 am

    I agree with you Eric, its time for Hunter to put up or shut up. He has no room to tell them what he will do and what he wont. He has to prove himself a starter before he can start running his mouth. What has he done to think he can tell them what he will do and what he wont. If he is not careful he will find himself in the unemployment line.

  24. 24
    StarStruck on April 26th, 2005 11:07 am

    benmaller.com quoting a boston.com article, reports that Glenn has permission to talk to three teams concerning a possible trade and that the Pats are one of them.

    Hunter for Glenn?

    I think I would like Marion to return to Dallas to command or compete for the FS spot and mentor the position for a year (possibly more).

  25. 25
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 12:00 pm

    we gambled last year on a FA out of football off the field CB that was injury prone and was not a Parcells Guy and never played much better than OK…..

    Why not put a guy like Aaron Glenn in the corral. Did anybody notice the number of CBs drafted in Round 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6………hey pretty soon you are going to have Matt Jones wanted to switch to CB……..

    A veteran like Glenn even if he does not play that many snaps can help Henry and Newman. Ask Julius Jones about working with Parcells guy Richie Anderson. We even had Adrian Murrel running pretty good two years ago. If the guy cannot cut it……..he gets cut. Murrel was released after some pretty good running. Parcells is a great Coach and a great Teacher…….that is why he has former Players on his staff. Do not underestimate the value of an experienced NFL guy like Glenn who can help Newman and Henry……….possibly play some Nickel or Corner if we have a major injury………and certainly work with the likes of Frazier, Thornton, Jones, Reeves and Hunter.

    Has anybody heard Hunter make these comments or just his agent? Pete……….go win a spot at CB or FS or Nickel………we do not even know if you can play. Hunter played some S in college so he has a little experience back there.

    Their are and have been great players at many positions in the secondary. However Jimmy Johnson drafted CBs and used them as DBs until he got Woodson. The corner especially a physical one with the size is certainly capable of playing FS. Perhaps not every corner could……..nor every FS or SS convert to CB or LB……..but some can and when you play in say the Secondary……..you have to have an overall understanding of what the other DBs are doing. We are not asking anybody to switch sides of the ball or run passing routes or anything. This aint rocket science it is football. The Corners and Safetys all meet with the Secondary coach for their specialized meetings. Everybody is in there together. A FS is a CB that Can Tackle………a SS is sometimes a smaller version of linebacker depending on how a team utilizes a guy. To me call em all Defensive Backs……and put em all out their and let the best one win the job. Also you have the Nickel backs and some teams drop a FS or SS into the LB spot on Nickel coverages and fill the other positions with other DBs. It all depends on your roster……..I mean a guy like Nguyen or Coakley did pretty good against the pass……..Bruschi for NE is a pass intercepting master……..but teams used to bring in a guy like Bill Bates to play LB on Nickel……….or Dime……..the more coverage guys you have that can also Tackle…….gives you a lot of flexibility back there. In a Dime Package you are going to have 5 front players and 6 DBs…………name our Six? Woodson, Beirault?, Scott?, Henry, Newman, Davis?, Dantzler?, Glenn?, Hunter?, Frazier…….a player to be named later?

    If you can get a veteran like Glenn with tread still on his tires………put him out there. Other than Linebacker there is no other position that requires as many Quantity of players ………and hopefully Quality as well as the Defensive Backs.

  26. 26
    Chris_X25 on April 26th, 2005 12:01 pm

    If, by any chance, we could get Ty Law to sign with the Boy’s, we could have (by far) one of the most intimidating secondaries this season. With a Williams and Law combo like that, I wouldn’t be surprised to see our defense in the top five this season. And remember guys defense wins championships “WeWillProtectThisHouse!!!”

  27. 27
    Don S. on April 26th, 2005 12:35 pm

    Glenn’s been officially cut…

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2046742

  28. 28
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 12:38 pm

    5 INTs last year

    Pro Bowl in 2002………Capers wanted to keep him and offered him less…….this guy would improve our secondary……..

  29. 29
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 12:59 pm

    His best year was 2002:

    16 GAMES, 56.0 TACKLES, 11 ASSISTS, 1 SACK, 5 INTS, 181 (INT) RETURN YARDS, 2 TDS, 13 PASSES DEFENDED.

    Last year was similar as he recorded 55 tackles, 5 INTs, and had 9 passes defended.

  30. 30
    Moh on April 26th, 2005 1:04 pm

    I like the addition of Glenn, u can never have too many solid corners, if Newman or Henry fall to injury we can just plug him in and go… and lets not forget we can also use him in nickel/dime situations of course, he’s only 32.. and plus, u guys seem to forget its not like the Cowboys are going to sign this guy for 3-4 years, i see him getting a 2 year deal max..

  31. 31
    Josh on April 26th, 2005 1:15 pm

    Bud Wilkins at OU invented the 3-4 out of a combined need to stop the wishbone and an over abundance of speedy LBs

    Don Shula fighting the injury bug on his dline actually brought the 3-4 to the Pros but they called it the “53″ because it centered on speedy LB Bob Matheson rushing the passer from mulitple positions. Bob Matheson was #53.

    John Madden made the 3-4 famous using it to salvage an injury riddled season and win Super Bowl XI.

    The 3-4 became fashionable in the 1970’s for many reasons the biggest one being there were more good LBs than DT. The problem with the 3-4 is the dline men are strickly block eaters and it is the LBs responsibility to stop the run. A team with a lot of 230 pound speed LBs had LOADS of trouble with power backs so teams loaded up on the big fellas and power back sets that is when the FB turned into a guard in the back field.

    Recently 2 forces have combined to make the 3-4 viable again the salary cap and 4 WR sets. Teams are finding LBs are MUCH cheaper than DEs and DTs to the point where LB is one of the easiest positions to franchise (altough rarely doen). Also the Rams shoot em out style has taken the FB off some rosters altogether and the run game more or less the power run game is drifting into the horizon with really only cold weather teams still favoring or employing it.

    The 3-4 is a nice system but is better served as a base or spring board unit from which teams develope hybrid looks. New England is the perfect case with their 3-4 often becoming a 2-5 or a 4-3 depending on the offensive set. The constant moving shift and multi position personell wreaks havok on QBs pre-snap read.

    It is the 3-4 hybrid that is the future of the NFL at least until teams bring the FB back.

  32. 32
    Josh on April 26th, 2005 1:16 pm

    I saw some of you submit some erooneous info on the creation of the 3-4 in another thread and thought I’d share this with you.

  33. 33
    Darrell M on April 26th, 2005 1:18 pm

    i like the thought of getting marion, law, and glen. sign them to a (what have you done for me lately) contract. (incentive) and to teach our youth. If hunter can’t stand the heat, he must not have that much confidence in himself. if he doesn’t; then how in the heck is bp suppose to have confidence in him.

    as far a bp being fair. how many players has he brought in that wasn’t worth a darn. and if they wasn’t; are they still around. my point exactly!!

  34. 34
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 1:31 pm

    we got another TE probably just a training camper but a TE as a FA Rookie…..Bill likes a lot of TEs…..

    FA Rookie OT signed from Nevada

    FA Rookie WR..NW Missouri….the WR had some pretty good numbers book in him says good route runner and nice hands……not bad quickness and separation but overall not a speedster………says a likely Slot Reciver and PR and KR………which Bill wants to upgrade anyway.

    My Guess is Jerry is already hammering out Rookie Contracts with Ware, Spears, Burnett, Canty, Ratliff, Beirault, Barber, and Petitti……..

    From what I read about Ware he sure sounds like the guy to come in and work hard. One thing about the veterans on our team, you do not have to look very hard to find good work ethic with Ellis, Glover, Nguyen and Roy Williams………I think these guys all look like good fits on the field and off. If Pettiti gets his weight in line he might compete for the tackle spot right away………or at least puts some fire in the mix with Rogers, Tucker and the rest…….maybe Rivera is the new leader along that line and gets those other guys into his workout Regimen.

  35. 35
    Darrell M on April 26th, 2005 1:33 pm

    i would also sign hakim, marion, and/or law, and a vet ROT and call it a day.

  36. 36
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 1:37 pm

    i thought about Hakim…….he was good with the Rams………did not do too bad last year either……..

    how is his speed? there will be more guys after June cuts also………Peerless Price possibly……..although he did not look all that good with the Falcons……

    how much would marion cost…….if i had to chose i go Glenn but if you can get both sure why not……

    nothing against the guy…….but I hope Ty Law has a long slow healing summer and cannot make camp for a team…….and comes to Dallas as a late day signee………hey a guy can dream cant he……..the combination of a guy like Law and Glenn and the committee of Rookies plus two pretty darn good corners in Henry and Newman………we would have one hell of a secondary and Nickel package……….even if it was only for a year or two to get that committee into starter role…….

  37. 37
    Louisville Eric on April 26th, 2005 2:10 pm

    Everson Walls did 10 sit-ups this afternoon. Let’s grab him.

  38. 38
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 2:34 pm

    he would have beat out a few guys in our secondary last year………LOL

  39. 39
    Kerry on April 26th, 2005 2:56 pm

    We need Depth at CB with Glenn around he could teach Frazier and the other young CB the tricks of the trade. I also think we should Sign Brock Marion for FS help. That way u give Justin Beraiultt time to learn the system. I’d love to see Brock back with the silver and blue.

    THE “D” IS BACK IN DALLAS

    “HOW ABOUT THOSE COWBOYS”

  40. 40
    Darrell M on April 26th, 2005 2:59 pm

    the only thing that i would think that more te would be helpful on is taking some of the punishment of reps, and see if any of them would be good on special teams.

  41. 41
    Chris Frei on April 26th, 2005 3:04 pm

    Aaron Glen is still a very good DB, maybe not young, but still very good. The signing indicates to me that they believe they are going to have a team this year. I would even argue, although I doubt the boys will do this, but I think glen could start over Henry. Glen is a great pick up & just helps the boys chances of making the playoffs. U CAN NEVER HAVE TO MANY VET DB’s on your team.

  42. 42
    mike on April 26th, 2005 3:10 pm

    adding him would be great former 3 time pro bowler for depth, hell yah excellent idea. hes from texas what more could you want, and he wants to stay in texas.

  43. 43
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 3:10 pm

    Glenn will probably want to start. Any open positions in the Boys’ secondary?

  44. 44
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 3:11 pm

    Hey let Newman and Henry beat out Aaron Glenn…………best player plays. Besides there are more than 2 corners on the field an awful lot in football schemes these days!!!!!

    Frazier and Reeves seemed to be the best of our rookie committee maybe they can both develop and learn as well Henry and T New from a vet like Glenn.

    Again this is the advantage, that I think an owner like Jerry is realizing in having a Coach like Parcells. How many of these guys sign with us ie Jason Ferguson as opposed to the team they were with or another club. Bill Parcells CLOSES the Sale!!!!! Sometimes it takes more being high or low bidder.

    Keep it up Bill!!!!!

  45. 45
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 3:12 pm

    If we sign Glenn, he will probably best suit our D at FS in our base defense. Although we could see him play the nickle corner and have maybe Beriault play safety.

  46. 46
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 3:16 pm

    Jon,

    If New England is in the mix here, they have some leverage because Glenn could see a better shot at starting CB there. Although its reported that Glenn wants to stay closer to home. Maybe he can be our Rod Woodson and play FS.

  47. 47
    Darrell M on April 26th, 2005 3:18 pm

    i think the next thing we need to be worry about is ROT!! has anyone seen where bp has addressed that issue other than a late rounder in the draft.

  48. 48
    Zach on April 26th, 2005 3:19 pm

    I agree with Jon, this move is good for two reasons: One it gives us a much better and older and experienced nickelback. And two it give Newman (not mathis) and Henry someone to compete with, as apposed to last year where Newman was the #1 starter hands down, and there was no way that he could lose his job. Maybe that complacentcey was one of the reasons why he didn’t do so well last year.

  49. 49
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 3:21 pm

    Boy if Glenn came to Big D to play FS for the Boys, what a slap in the face for Hunter. A proven NFL corner humbly accepting a roll Hunter refused!!

  50. 50
    Lou on April 26th, 2005 3:32 pm

    Hunter’s days are done with this signing. Even if it is just for depth this is a message that Hunter can start looking for another place to play. Too bad he let his head get the best of him because he could have been good at FS, same with Derek Ross and Antonio Bryant, players that showed potential.

  51. 51
    ryan on April 26th, 2005 3:35 pm

    nice post rafael

    can someone give me a list of all the undrafted FA’s that have made it big and been real studs in the nfl?? i mean have there really been any or not?

  52. 52
    randall on April 26th, 2005 3:38 pm

    Has anyone thought about Az-Zahir Hakim, we could use a third reciever!

  53. 53
    mike on April 26th, 2005 3:51 pm

    just read that we have made an offer to him already, if we do sign him then he prolly wont start unless he does beat someone out more then likely itll be insurance so the injuries that happened to us last year wont be as big a factor this year, if it happened again. dont look for him to play free safety they think beriault is the answer to the fs spot. parcells already told him its his to lose more or less. depth is very crucial, especially at corner. on cowboys daily they are saying mrion is not out of the question but bringing in to many veterans hurts the younger players, but we will see in the coming days, weeks.

  54. 54
    dave on April 26th, 2005 4:00 pm

    I believe what I said in the other thread last night will still take place. I think Glenn comes here to start at one of those 4 DB spots assuming no other signings and he makes the final cut. With our DBs, there’s no way he doesn’t make the team without someone better being signed. SS is set. Newman, Henry, and Glenn in the other 3. My guess is that Glenn is in the FS spot due to having lost a step (but not too much) since his pro bowl days. I doubt Newman or Henry will be moved out of the CB positions. Henry was paid too much and I’m sure all but promised the starting job. Newman was a shut down CB when he wasn’t on an island every play last year. If Glenn isn’t the FS, he’ll be the nickel, the backup CB, and rotate in a lot. I bet he’ll be on the field in over half the plays in a worse-case scenario (for him). Having a good friend with season tickets means I have watched most of the Texan home games and Glenn is better at FS than anyone else we have right now or anyone I see on the horizon - including Marion. With all the defensive help Detroit needs, I can’t see why they would cut Marion if he had anything left. That’s why everyone was shocked when they picked Mike Williams. Not because Williams wasn’t good, but they had bigger needs on the other side of the ball.

    That’s my story and I’m sticking with it.

  55. 55
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 4:05 pm

    mike,

    Where you reading all this?

  56. 56
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 4:15 pm

    Beriault had 120+ tackles last year. Keep the offense in front of him and he should create a nice physical presence with Roy. Most of the Cowboys fans here feel like we need a “cover” guy at FS. Not me, although getting Glenn on the field for a certain # of plays would be nice, so getting him at FS might be an option. Beriault and Roy get my vote. For anyone disagreeing: What starting secondary led the league in INTs last season? ….. I’ll give you a hint … their two safeties, well, one has the size of a college LB and the other is nicknamed “the hammer”. Yep the Seatle Seahawks, with two big hitters at safety, had the most INTs from their starting secondary.

  57. 57
    dave on April 26th, 2005 4:22 pm

    One more thing about Glenn playing safety. Maybe it was because I live in Houston and kept hearing about the Texans getting Buchanon and the local sports guys saying that Glenn’s time may be up, but on draft day I kept thinking that AG being from TX and one of Bill’s boys, it made me wonder that there might have been some back door talks which enabled Bill to ignore the safeties that were on the board. Just a thought, but only Thomas Davis was considered a “sure” thing from all the mock drafts I watched.

  58. 58
    Rafael Vela on April 26th, 2005 4:25 pm

    Josh,

    Good snyopsis of the 3-4, thought I’ll pick one nit and add to your last good point.

    A. Wilkinson developed the 3-4, or the 5-2 or Okie as they called it, in the ’50s, during his great championship runs. He was several years into retirement before the wishbone was developed in ‘68, though the 5-2 had become THE offense in college football by that time.

    B. You are dead on about the lack of a FB making the 3-4 even more viable. When he came back to coaching in ‘03 Parcells remarked that linebackers were now set so deep off the LOS that quick-hitting running plays to fullbacks, plays that were the break and butter for guys like Larry Csonka in the ’70s, would pop for 5 to 6 yards automatically today because they would face no short opposition.

    The first team that can get itself a really, big, quick, Csonka or Mike Alstott-type runner will get a short-term edge and start the pendulum back towards the offenses.

  59. 59
    mike on April 26th, 2005 4:35 pm

    i have subscription to ranch report, cbs vip, mainly get everything from there.

  60. 60
    dave on April 26th, 2005 4:38 pm

    Eric, the reason why so many have been talking about a cover guy at safety was because that’s where we were beat so much last year. It will be even less desirable to have another hard-hitting safety that can’t cover well now that we’re in the 3-4. Those 7 guys are the ones being paid to get in there and hurt someone, clog up the run, and put pressure on the QB. I also have my doubts about Beriault being a major contributor this year. 120 tackles is nice, but he did play for Ball State. The FS has many different coverage responsibilities depending on the read. I wouldn’t expect to see much of him other the special teams this year but I could be wrong.

  61. 61
    big jim on April 26th, 2005 4:41 pm

    What’s all this bring in a veteran to mold our youg players talk?
    In the age of the salary cap, we cannot afford to do that. That’s why assitant coaches get paid. Emmit, Troy, and Michael didn’t need someone to mold them. They put the work in to become the best.

    If we pick up Glenn at the right price, and he turns in his annual 5 interceptions, then great.

    Otherwise, if their not going to be on the field, don’t sign them.

  62. 62
    mike on April 26th, 2005 4:44 pm

    alot of the reason we were beat in coverage was no pressure on the qb i think that was the major reason we were beat so much.

  63. 63
    tim on April 26th, 2005 5:31 pm

    mike,

    how about you post some of the juicy good articles ffrom the ranchreport on here for all us to read??

    i cant afford an extra payment right now and would LOVE to have that to read…think about it

  64. 64
    tim on April 26th, 2005 5:33 pm

    Rafael,

    great post

    do you think you can give me a list of all the undrafted FA’s that have made it big and been real studs in the nfl?? i mean have there really been any or not?

  65. 65
    ryan on April 26th, 2005 5:34 pm

    who the hell is tim????

    why are you copying and pasting my comment???

  66. 66
    ryan on April 26th, 2005 5:35 pm

    rafael,

    could you possibly give ME a list of all the undrafted FA’s that have made it big and been real studs in the nfl?? i mean have there really been any or not?

  67. 67
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 5:54 pm

    Dave,

    I’m not saying get a guy that can only hit, sure he has got to be the last line of defense, especially on deep routes. But get me a guy who can take a good angle on a crossing route and give a good knock on the WR to make him think twice about going across the middle again. A safety that can make a good break and make the tackle right away on a 5 yard pattern when its 3rd and 7, and stop the receiver from getting the 1st down. People keep talking about how bad the Boys secondary was beat last year, but playing defense is a team game, and as stated before on this site, the best help we could have gotten for Newman, Roy and company was the changes we made to our front 7. I just prefer a better tackler than a good “cover guy”. Really, I just don’t understand this term “cover guy” when it comes to S, because if you get a safety on a WR one on one, the advantage always goes to the offense. So who is he covering? Safety is a lot more about football knowledge and knowing where to be in the defense that is called. “Big hitter” or “cover safety” if you missed your assignment and end up in the wrong place, then you aren’t going to cut it in the NFL. Again just my opinion, and I know its not popular here, but Beriault had 120+ tackles, so it seems to me that he has a nose for the ball, and it would sure seem, by that stat, that he knows where he is supposed to be. From my perception “cover safeties” are the ones who get a lot of INTs. Am I right? Well I don’t want a guy ball hawking from the safety position, because that is what he is a safety, the last line of defense.

  68. 68
    BlueTerp on April 26th, 2005 5:55 pm

    Found this rumor and thought you all might be interested:

    “Very interesting news from Detroits Sports Radio 1130 said the Lions did not draft Mike Williams to replace injury prone Charlie Rogers; BUT, Jim Rome said he has insider sources that are telling him, Matt Millen spoke with the Cowboys about a draft day trade, time ran out and the trade did not go through. Rome says this trade has fuel and states the Lions are trying to swap Charlie Rogers to the Cowboys for DT La’Roi Glover. Rome went on the say the Lions would love to add glover to the DT spot, and the Cowboys may use Glover less now that they are heading towards a 3-4 formation. Rome said he would not be surprised if a trade is made in the coming weeks!”

  69. 69
    Don S. on April 26th, 2005 6:24 pm

    On losing Hunter… why would Dallas cut him? If I’m Parcells I still take him to camp to see where he fits in. If he competes and earns a spot so be it. The fact that he didn’t want to move to FS is just one less way for him to make the team.

    My guess is, as camp moves along he’ll be more motivated to get on the field, in whatever way possible. There’s nothing worse than sitting on the bench while a less talented player is on the field, I don’t care what position it is.

    Imagine his choices next year if he never gets on the field or if he’s cut late in training camp this year (possible trade value if someone has a CB come up lame).

    No reason for Dallas to let this guy go. None whatsoever.

  70. 70
    nate on April 26th, 2005 6:27 pm

    you guys all of these senerios would be great; signing marion, glenn, law or whoever. with the salary cap we dont have that kind of money, besides thats a lot of roster spots for how many are going to be on the field. i know we need depth in the secondary but u can only have a 53 man roster…

  71. 71
    Carioca on April 26th, 2005 6:36 pm

    So has Glenn actually signed or is he just holding onto an offer? Any info on what Glenn’s contract offer is? I hope we’ll not revert to over paying older players (ie., Rivera) as that mediocre organization in the nation’s capital. That’s could become a bad omen.

  72. 72
    Carioca on April 26th, 2005 6:40 pm

    And is it a trade situation or a free agent situation? We need to be careful with our future draft choices… let’s not get too greedy just for the present.

    Given no news on the Cowboy’s site, I assume nothing is yet consumated and we might not even have Glenn in camp come July.

  73. 73
    Carioca on April 26th, 2005 6:43 pm

    by the way — this is from 2 hours ago — looks like NE is not in the hunt for Glenn…

    FOXBORO, Mass. (AP) - The New England Patriots signed free agent cornerback Chad Scott on Tuesday after he was released for salary cap reasons by the Steelers following eight seasons in Pittsburgh.

  74. 74
    Raul Villaronga on April 26th, 2005 6:45 pm

    That could be because Glenn’s agent may have told NE that he has indeed agreed to terms with Dallas, as was reported earlier…

  75. 75
    calvin on April 26th, 2005 7:49 pm

    Is their any one out there that recall’s game one of last year! Our corners were toasted so bad, I almost turned the T.V. off! They couldn’t cover slant’s, they couldn’t cover deep! If we have a chance to get gifted and learned veterane in Aaron Glenn, what the “hell are you complaining about!” The player’s your talking about are not 2nd and 3rd round player but 4th and 5th rd pick’s that are lucky thier still in the league! A few years ago we were all so hyped to have “Bill” come to Dallas, “LET HIM COACH.” Would you rather have Mike Tice! Calvin

  76. 76
    Ryan on April 26th, 2005 7:55 pm

    Rafael, OR SOMEONE

    could you possibly give me a list of all the undrafted FA’s that have made it big and been real studs in the nfl?? i mean have there really been any or not?

  77. 77
    nate on April 26th, 2005 7:55 pm

    calvin,

    we are letting him coach but we are aloowed to have an opinion, right? parcells knows moer than al of us combined no question but it doesnt mean we cant say what we think would work

  78. 78
    Raul Villaronga on April 26th, 2005 7:56 pm

    Ryan:

    I don’t know if any such list.

  79. 79
    Kevin on April 26th, 2005 8:01 pm

    Hey BlueTerp,

    I love the trade for Charlie Rodgers for Glover. I hate giving up Glover but I think that if Rodgers can be healthy, the 05-06 Cowboy’s are looking like potential NFC champions and at least the most improved team in the NFL.

    Add Glenn and we have only ROT to deal with and I think that with Rivera next to him, Tucker will be fine.

    Man, you guys are getting me excited for next season.

    I sure hope that these rumors are happening. That is the one thing I like about Jerry Jones. If there is anyway possible to improve the team, you can be sure he will try.

  80. 80
    Ryan on April 26th, 2005 8:16 pm

    if anyone is interested, heres a list of the

    BEST UNDRAFTED FA’s CURRENTLY IN THE NFL:

    jake delhome
    billy volek
    priest holmes
    brad hoover
    antonio gates
    barry sims
    matt lepsis
    brian waters
    brandon moore
    hank fraley
    drew bennett
    rod smith
    wayne chrebet
    james hall
    adewale ogunleye
    sam rayburn
    pat williams
    london fletcher
    shelton quarles
    antonio pierce
    nick harper
    kelly herndon
    kevin kaesviharn
    sammy knight
    brian russel
    adam vinateiri
    brian moorman
    mike vanderjagt
    eddie drummond

    i stand by JON’S point when he said kickers are walk on FA’s because VINATEIRI was!

  81. 81
    Ryan on April 26th, 2005 8:17 pm

    i fount it on a site, so sorry for asking for it so many times

  82. 82
    StarStruck on April 26th, 2005 8:22 pm

    Ryan

    Which site?

  83. 83
    J on April 26th, 2005 8:29 pm

    good evening all,

    i think eric and dave have hit on something thaat needs to be considered closer,

    i don’t know if i am just reading too closely, but in the information that is out about glenn, he says he is looking for a place to start-

    now most of us have penciled newman and henry in as the starters, and we go on to assume that glenn would be here as the nickelback and to add depth, but he doesn’t sound like he is ready to be anything other than a starter.

    is that just the kind of fire we want from veteran acquasitions or the sounds of a future locker room problem? meaning, even as one of Bill’s guys, is glenn the type of person we want on the team? can he taake a reduced role, or even a different postion (FS) if he is asked

  84. 84
    Ryan on April 26th, 2005 8:49 pm
  85. 85
    Ryan on April 26th, 2005 8:50 pm

    there are 2 new stories on http://www.dallascowboys.com and they are about RICHIE ANDERSON, AARON GLENN, and a lot of other GREAT INFO!!!

  86. 86
    mike on April 26th, 2005 8:53 pm

    blue terp,
    im trying to find something on that if you find a link or something on that post it. i personally wouldnt do it, glover is a perennial pro bowler and while rodgers has a ton of up side hes hurt more then not. looking for a wr im sure theyll be a few cut here in by june 1.

  87. 87
    Ryan on April 26th, 2005 8:53 pm

    oh and dont think were gonna be getting marion back, we looked at tape of him tuesday and BP or JJ i guess say that they arent wanting him back.

    mickey spagnola said that HAKIM might be nice for returns and such but that if we got him, you wouldnt see much of copper, crayton, or randal williams who all showed promise last season.

  88. 88
    Jay on April 26th, 2005 8:56 pm

    Gleen is a good pick up, but would it benefit the Cowboys more if Glenn played FS rather than nickel CB.

  89. 89
    dave on April 26th, 2005 8:59 pm

    It seems like I missed alot during that 3 hour nap on the couch.

    J, I’ve mentioned a couple of times in other posts that I live in Houston and I can you tell that during the season, I hear Glenn’s name almost every day. This guy is the ultimate pro and team guy - not to mention very active in the community. I have never once heard him complain in 3 years with the Texans. This guy is going to be a leader and you’ll never hear him making waves. Even when things aren’t to his liking - like I’m sure things were when Buchanon replaced him - he never complained. He just took what the Texans gave him and looked at it as an opportunity to move on to something else in life. He was on one of the talk shows this afternoon and he basically said the same thing. This guy won’t be a problem.

  90. 90
    StarStruck on April 26th, 2005 9:00 pm

    Thanks Ryan

    J

    I was skimming the football boards on sabre.com, a UVA fan site, and guess what or who I found there?

    I found “The Truth”…

    He was making articulate, grammatically correct and non-antagonistic—polite, posts over there. I assume it was the same guy because he said, “I’m not a Boys fan…” which was apparent. I thought you’d find that a little interesting.

    And to pick up on what you’re saying about Glenn starting, I don’t remember where, but I read that Dom Capers tried to keep Glenn on board for less money and/or a diminished role. Dunta Robinson earned one corner job with 87 combined tackles and 6 Int’s (vs. 66/5) and Philip Buchanon was hired to man the other post in an apparent youth movement. Dom probably wanted a veteran backup and a situational option.

    This seems in keeping with some of the thinking here and elsewhere. I wonder if Glenn will be so willing to do in Dallas what he wasn’t in Houston?
    Unless, he some other incentive to start…

  91. 91
    J on April 26th, 2005 9:23 pm

    well Dave and StarStruck,

    you make it hard to decide,

    i know Bill usually associates with high character guys, but i don’t know anything about him off the field. i am sure Bill can handle any problems, i just want us to avoid as much distraction as possible.

    so maybe picking up Glenn and moving Hunter is a move toward cutting out a distraction?

  92. 92
    darrell w on April 26th, 2005 9:26 pm

    Wow you fellows hit me pretty hard…problem deserved most of it. Okay. I will play along. What is Glenn speed in the 40, how much does he bench press and can he play the slot and also safety. How much money does he want? And, how does it effect the salary cap? The point I should have made is that by consistantly taking these veterans, we are getting no more than 1 to 2 years of play. I am aware that Glenn is a great guy and does all that community stuff…but can he cover receivers? Be gentle I bruise very easily. LOL

  93. 93
    J on April 26th, 2005 9:30 pm

    and Star,

    as far as that other guy and last night are concerned,

    i have always come away from this site with more knoweldge and opinions than just about anywhere and for some guy to get up on the wrong side of the bed and try to ruin this for the rest of us,
    well that just aint right.

  94. 94
    Cooper on April 26th, 2005 9:33 pm

    I know its only a rumor, but the Glover trade is definitely interesting. I would love to have Rogers, but he isn’t worth Glover. Glover is possibly the best tackle in football. He’s a pro bowler every year. Rogers may turn out to be great, but he stays injured.

    I might do the deal if Detroit gave up more than Rogers. I’m greedy.

  95. 95
    mike on April 26th, 2005 9:34 pm

    i guess no to marion

    Despite the team’s need for a safety, the Cowboys aren’t very interested in 12-year veteran Brock Marion, who was released Monday by the Lions.

    Marion, a seventh-round pick of the Cowboys in 1993, played five years in Dallas, starting 43 games alongside strong safety Darren Woodson. Since leaving the Cowboys after the 1997 season, Marion signed a free-agent deal with Miami, where he earned three Pro Bowl selections in his six seasons. Marion finished third on the Lions defense with 112 tackles this past season and was second on the team with three interceptions, starting all 16 games.

    The Cowboys studied film on Marion Tuesday, but want to go with more youth at the position. Currently, the team is expecting Lynn Scott, Keith Davis, Clint Finley and now sixth-round pick Justin Beriault to compete for the free safety position, with Roy Williams sliding over to strong safety.

    The Cowboys also had their eyes on Atlanta safety Cory Hall, who was re-signed by the Falcons on Friday. Hall, a six-year veteran, was released by Atlanta in the off-season after recording 60 tackles and an interception in 13 starts last year. But Hall re-signed last week and will likely compete for a starting job once again this year.

  96. 96
    J on April 26th, 2005 9:38 pm

    Cooper, would hate to see La’Roi go, but what else does detroit have extra to kick in that we would be interested in?

  97. 97
    mike on April 26th, 2005 9:40 pm

    im sure itll be like a 3 yr deal but mainly hell be here for 2 years. 40 times and all that dont matter hes a proven veteran, he will bring more leadership to 2 cb that are very young on our team, thatll be his biggest asset. marion o well i wouldve liked to see him come back but alot of veterans is a good and bad situation. keeps younger guys from learning yet brings proven players anyways, still glover and a 2nd or 3rd next year might ( i say might ) be worth glover along with rodgers

  98. 98
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 9:42 pm

    j,

    Parcells always tells his players as it is, and very clearly states, “I am going to play the best player.” So Glenn will have his shot to compete for the starting CB spot. He might also see some time at FS, just to get him on the field if Parcells feels he needs Glenn’s expierence out on the field. But Dave makes a great point too, Aaron is a team guy and the ultimate professional.

  99. 99
    Raul Villaronga on April 26th, 2005 9:43 pm

    If there was any discussion between Detroit and Dallas on draft Saturday, it might explain the glutton of DE/DT players that Dallas selected.

  100. 100
    mike on April 26th, 2005 9:43 pm

    blue terp, was it todays rome show? http://www.jimrome.com you can listen to todays show on there…

  101. 101
    nate on April 26th, 2005 9:44 pm

    mike,

    man u copied and pasted all of that from spangola on http://www.dallascowboys.com. its all right tho

  102. 102
    LaMonte on April 26th, 2005 9:45 pm

    Trade Glover for Rogers.

    I just took a look at Detroits roster and they need a DE not at DT. I guess they could move Glover to end. Still sounds iffy. If Dallas were going to make this trade BP must have real high hopes for Blade and Carson. (Didn’t one of them get hurt before NFLE)Getting rid of Glover would really limit the flexiblity of the front 7. I like Rogers when he’s not broken and Dallas could use receiving help. Detroits signing of Kevin Johnson makes him somewhat expendable and they may be trying to get Eddie Drummond more touches than just on special teams, I can see why Detroit would do it. On paper they have would could be a devastating receiving corps, but that’s only on paper. Rogers has been more potential than production. Adding a player like Glover would give them a very solid front 4. For the same reasons I see Detroit wanting to make the trade are the same for Dallas not making the trade. Do you give up a pro bowl DT for a potentially very good wide receiver. I wouldn’t.
    Here’s the question what would you want from Detroit in a trade.
    Glover (starting pro bowler) = Rogers (former #1 pick w/upside often injured)
    or would you want future picks plus Rogers

  103. 103
    J on April 26th, 2005 9:46 pm

    okay, so i am being won over to the glenn side, but i think what mike says about marion could be true also for glenn (being in the way of the younger guys). the young corners need to play some time don’t they?

  104. 104
    J on April 26th, 2005 9:48 pm

    LaMonte,

    blade went down for the year

    and i would take as much as i could get,

    rogers aand picks shouldn’t be too much

  105. 105
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 9:52 pm

    darrell,

    It’s OK to have a good number of vets on the team, especially when you have a wave of young guys right behind them, which Dallas does. From April 25th on this team isn’t going to get much younger, so why not get some sauvy vets, especially the classy team players, to take some of these young guys under their wings. Could help build the character of these rookies, second year, and third year guys, and also teach them the nuances of the game.

    cough! cough! Why do you think Joey Gallaway, Antonio Bryant, and Derrick Ross are gone?

  106. 106
    mike on April 26th, 2005 9:55 pm

    nate,

    duh i copied it i dont capitilize and i very rarely use commas and other english crap. all good though im just trying to relay some info to everyone here.

  107. 107
    mike on April 26th, 2005 9:56 pm

    if you want me to ill put who its from now on so people dont think i thought all of that and typed that…jk

  108. 108
    dave on April 26th, 2005 9:57 pm

    darrell, you’re correct that AG is no more than a 1-2 year option while a younger, long-term solution is found. Maybe it’s Beriault, but I still think he won’t see the field much this year. And remember, that a 6th rounder is not a shoe-in to make the team. Those 6th, 7th, and undrafted FAs usually have to show they can play special teams to make it. I think AG comes in this year and next year Bill goes after the remaining big need positions like WR, FS, and OT. There is also the possibility that one of the guys drafted could be one of those long term solutions. The June cuts will mainly be other players like AG - older guys making too much money - so they would likely be short-term options as well. Also, the speed in the 40 and how much he bench presses is a pretty useless measure once a player gets to the NFL. AG has a body of work and hours of game tape against other NFL players so he would be measured by the year he had last year. He also still has to beat out the other players in camp. Not great, but decent as a CB last year. Could make a pretty good FS for a year or two.

    To answer your questions about salary cap: it just depends on the deal that is signed. The contract Glenn played under in Houston is out the window because he was released. So, the cap figure is based on whatever contract he signs.

    One more thing: I’m not sold on the idea of Glover for Rogers as mentioned earlier. Has Rogers even seen the field yet? The guy has gotten hurt in both of his first two seasons. I don’t think I’d give up Glover unless Rogers is 100% healthy and he’s checked out thoroughly. Even then, I’m not sure I do that deal. This guy has the Texans thanking their lucky stars that Andre Johnson was the Lion’s 2nd choice. Remember, draft boards were unsure, but most said Rogers was more of a sure thing. Meanwhile, Johnson has just about reached the elite level of WRs while Rogers has been healing and watching. Could be one of those injury-prone guys that never live up to their expectations. Of course, with Ferguson at NT and the 37 DL picked up in the draft, they have the option of considering the deal.

  109. 109
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 9:58 pm

    j,

    The young CBs should get on the field some. In long passing situations, Parcells likes to play with three down linemen and two linebackers, with 6 DBs. He will mix it up but expect these different looks from the Tuna.

  110. 110
    Eric on April 26th, 2005 10:01 pm

    Dave,

    I think you missed my post ….. while you were sleeping. Check it out. I’d like to know your thoughts. ty

  111. 111
    CHI_TOWN on April 26th, 2005 10:08 pm

    I rather give them Ellis then Glover. Lions would need to add a kicker to balance out that trade. At least a 2nd rounder

  112. 112
    mike on April 26th, 2005 10:16 pm

    another lil thing glenn and keyshon are real good friends and he has the same agent as parcells..

  113. 113
    mike on April 26th, 2005 10:17 pm

    how about pete hunter and a 2nd for rodgers since it looks like hunter will not be getting much playing time…..

  114. 114
    LaMonte on April 26th, 2005 10:18 pm

    J
    If it goes down I would want Rogers, Bell and Bubin. Get another DT and OL depth. If I’m giving up solid production I want as many chances as possible to get a solid contributor. Detroit might not want to give up that many players but they get a guaranteed pro bowler. I guess BP has to weigh the benefits of keeping Glover whose production is probably going to decrease within 3 years (no disrespect but I’m just looking at age for the position) and 3 young players that you get at least 3 years and maybe one or more will give you 5-7 at a position of need. This hypothetical trade would be like a pre 2006 draft. If the guys I selected pan out then you have ultimate flexiblity going into next years draft.

  115. 115
    Jon on April 26th, 2005 10:20 pm

    Glover for Rogers? What are ya’ll smoking.

    Glover is our only PRO BOWLER………along the D Line………since I cannot remember when.

    All these great rookies that we got are ROOKIES…….nothing more nothing less. They look great on Film, great combines, look like Studs…….but hey yet to take a snap.

    You do not trade a guy like Glover for Rogers………if we are going to trade with Detroit for a Reciver make it Roy Williams or Mike Wiliams and let them keep Mr. Rogers in their Neighborhood………..and i would not do a straight up for either Williams for Glover I would want MORE.

    Glover can play DT in a 4-3 Nose Tackle in a 3-4 or DE in either and has lined up at DE in Pro Bowl. Glover is one of the strongest men in the NFL, a great guy off the field………forget about it……..we need Glover and Ellis and all these rookies to meet the potential of John Abraham, Willie McGinnest, Jason Ferguson and cannot believe I am even mentioning his name but hey Bill Parcells said it…….old number 56.

    Gentleman please lets not do what the Redskins do and lose more in FA than we gain. We got a nice hand to play next season, and I guarntee you Laroi Glover is going to be BIG PART OF IT!!!!!

    AG looks like he helps us immediately in the Secondary, wished we had an FA like him last year.