Browse > Home / Archive: 12. May 2005

The San Antonio Saints?

May 12, 2005

The New Orleans press is abuzz with word that Saints owner Tom Benson has talked to San Antonio about moving the Saints to the Alamo City. While many in Louisiana take this as a bargaining ploy — Benson, whose Saints rank 31st in revenue in the NFL, has been trying to force a better lease from the state — a real move would have disatrous consequences for Cowboys fans in Texas. Consider:

NFL territories and blackout rules would make the Saints THE Fox team in the San Antonio and Austin markets. Right now, the Texans and ‘Pokes co-exist peacefully, with the Texans on CBS and the Cowboys on Fox. The Saints would blow this arrangement apart. Any Cowboys fan living in these markets would have to get the Sunday ticket or go to a sports bar. Austin’s Fox affiliate would face the horrible choice of annoying the NFL, by working outside of the blackout rule, or forcing a team most Austinites don’t care about onto the city.

And let’s not forget San Antonio, where the Cowboys have held training camp. It’s quite possible that the new Saints would face a problem the Oilers had in early ’70s; being the second most popular team in their home city.

This would be a stupid move for Benson. The Alamodome is not a luxury-box-laden facility, and luxury boxes are the lifeblood of all new stadiums. San Antonio is also one of the poorest major cities and would not have the business base to fill the boxes on a level seen league wide. If Benson thought New Orleans was small potatoes revenue-wise, let him move to San Antonio.

If Benson was really a good poker player, he would have been caught talking to Los Angeles. This move only makes him look like a rube — or so Cowboys fans should hope. If Benson were to make the move — hey, anything is possible; the NFL is still home to Bud Adams, right? — Cowboys fans from the Rio Grande Valley to Austin could get a raw deal.

Written by Rafael Vela · Filed Under News | 45 Comments 

Turning Their Noses on Greatness

May 12, 2005

With five Super Bowl victories, an unprecedented eight Super Bowl appearances, and 20 consecutive winning seasons the Dallas Cowboys are rich in a tradition of success. “America’s Team” has appeared in a record 10 NFC Championship games and has won 32 playoff games, the most since the AFL/NFL merger, yet something has eluded the NFL’s most prolific franchise.

For the players who made the plays, whether it be a pancake block, a jarring hit, or a nicely threaded pass, only five of them have made it into pro football’s Hall of Fame.

This may not be as eye popping as it really is, but just consider that the lowly San Diego Chargers, who became a pro team the same year as the Cowboys (1960), have also had five Hall of Fame players inducted into the Hall. While the Raiders, another franchise introduced in 1960, have sported 10 Hall of Fame players. Yet, Oakland has had marginal success when compared to Dallas’.

Are Cowboys’ greats being snubbed?

Cliff Harris and Rayfield Wright found a way to combined for 12 pro bowls, 8 All-Pro teams, and 4 Super Bowl rings, yet can’t find their way into Canton’s hallowed halls. Despite being two of only thirteen players to play in 5 Super Bowls, Harris and Wright have been ignored by the writers who induct ex-NFLers annually. Do Harris’ and Wright’s accomplishments warrant a shrine in Canton? That question may be argued for plenty years to come, but did having a star on their helmet have anything to do with why they don’t?

Unlike the Cowboy’s alumnus before him, Michael Irvin’s case, is a bit different. Irvin played wide receiver, a position where he could rack up stats … and that’s exactly what he did. So how does Michael’s career compare to previously enshrined receivers? Well, Hall of Fame wide out, Charlie Joiner had 750 receptions and 65 touchdowns.

Ironically, the “Playmaker” retired with the same exact numbers, but Irvin played 80 games less (159-239) than Joiner and has 3 shiny rings on his fingers, while Joiner has none. 80 games! That’s 5 full season’s worth of games! Fred Biletnikoff compiled 589 receptions, 8,974 yards, and 76 TDs during his Hall of Fame career. While Irvin caught over 150 more passes and had almost 2,000 more yards (11,904) than Biletnikoff, the Raiders wide out did hit paydirt 11 more times than Irvin.

Our #88 also played against another H.O.F. wide out, James Lofton. Lofton’s tenure in the NFL was 4 years longer than Irvin’s, but their numbers were similar, as Lofton had 764/14,004/75 respectfully.

The “Playmakers” numbers are there, and in some cases far exceed Hall of Fame credentials! Take Lynn Swan for example, he had 336 receptions, 5,462 yards, 51 touchdowns. An astounding 414 receptions less and 6,442 yards less than Irvin. In fact, you can double Swan’s receptions and yardage, and he still has less than Irvin.

“There was not one time I ever thought about playing for any other organization other than the Dallas Cowboys. I didn’t want to give my heart to any other fans other than the Dallas fans because that’s what they gave me.”- Michael Irvin upon retiring in July of 2000 .

If only the writers who vote understood what it means to be a Cowboy. Does a bias against America’s Team really exist?

Written by Eric R · Filed Under General | 50 Comments 

DISCLAIMER: This site and its contents are for informational and amusement purposes only. This site is NOT officially sponsored by, nor endorsed by the Dallas Cowboys football organization, its players, coaches, staff, or the National Football League. Nothing written anywhere within this site is intended to be perceived as the site being so sponsored or endorsed. All original work, articles and comment posted by Rafael Vela, Raul Villaronga or invited guest bloggers, however, are protected by applicable copyright laws. Comments written by posters visiting the site are voluntarily submitted to stimulate discussion and debate without the expectation of copyright protection on the part of those visiting posters. It is not the responsibility of this site or its authors to enforce the copyright protection of such comments posted by visitors to this site. The authors cannot assume any liability for actions taken in reliance on these articles...that would be just silly and Don Meredith (who also does not officially sponsor nor endorse this site, but we love him anyway) well, he would just laugh at you. Thank you.